1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list.

2. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff on January 2, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 13, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with F and the real estate listed in the separate sheet, setting the lease agreement as KRW 30 million, the period from June 11, 2015 to June 11, 2017, and the rent as KRW 1.5 million per month.

B. The F died on December 7, 2015, and jointly succeeded to the property of Defendant C and E, the spouse of F, Defendant C and children.

C. The Defendants did not pay the tea from May 11, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The fact that the Defendants, who jointly succeeded to the right of lease under the instant lease agreement, did not delay in the payment of two or more different periods is as seen earlier, is clear in the record that the purport of the instant lease agreement and the application for modification of the cause of the claim were served on the Defendants on the grounds of the Defendants’ failure to pay two or more different periods of rent, and thus, the instant lease agreement was terminated.

Therefore, the defendants deliver the apartment of this case to the plaintiff, and the defendants jointly and severally (the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the rent to the plaintiff) are obligated to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent or rent, calculated at a rate of 1.5 million won per month, to the plaintiff.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.