beta
Text
1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:
(a) deliver each real estate listed in the separate sheet;
(b) 10,250,000 won and its corresponding;
Reasons
1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts can be acknowledged in each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 8 (including paper numbers).
The Plaintiffs jointly own each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”).
B. On August 14, 2009, the Defendant: (a) leased the instant real estate from Plaintiff C with a deposit of KRW 25,000,000; (b) monthly rent of KRW 2,700,000 (excluding value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply); (c) the end of February 2010 until the rent of KRW 2,50,000; and (d) the end of each month during which the rent was paid; and (e) up to the day after the lease was leased with the period of KRW 24 months.
C. However, since the Defendant paid KRW 20,000,000 on December 8, 2015, the Defendant did not pay the rent properly.
Plaintiff
C On January 25, 2016, the Defendant sent to the Defendant any content-certified mail that contains the intent to terminate the above lease agreement on the grounds of delinquency in rent, and the said mail was served to the Defendant on the following day.
E. Meanwhile, the Defendant did not pay a total of KRW 38,220,000 as of February 2, 2016.
2. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant delivers the real estate of this case to the plaintiffs, and as requested by the plaintiffs, 10,250,000 won remaining after deducting the deposit of 25,00,000 won from the lease deposit of 35,250,000 won from the overdue rent of 35,250,000 won, and damages for delay shall be paid at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from April 13, 2016 to the date of complete payment, which is the day following the delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case. The defendant is obligated to pay unjust enrichment equivalent to 2,970,00 won per month from March 31, 206 to the day of completion of delivery of the real estate
3. The conclusion is that the plaintiffs' claims are reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.