1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company that imports and sells accelerators in custody, while engaging in the export and import business and the agency business, and the plaintiff is a person who purchased the fruit accelerator called "C" from the defendant (hereinafter "the plaintiff") in this case.

B. On May 22, 2012, the Plaintiff purchased G department stores located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and F, which are operated by D (hereinafter “D”) for KRW 5,605,000, in which the Defendant imported and sold from the Defendant, and for the same year:

5. Around 24.24. The Plaintiff’s office on the third floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul H building (hereinafter “the instant site”) installed the instant unit accelerator, and around that time, the instant unit accelerator was kept in the department owned by the Plaintiff in the instant unit.

C. The instant accelerator discontinued around July 2015 through August 8, 2015.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff discovered that the operation of the instant accelerator ceased, and notified D and the Defendant thereof. On the same day, D visited the instant site by the head of the team and one technician in the head of the team and the Defendant.

E. At the time when the employees D and the Defendant’s employees arrive at the site of this case, the internal temperature of the instant accelerator was 32°C, and part of the departments owned by the Plaintiff and owned by the Plaintiff, which were kept inside the instant accelerator, was damaged by knife and knife.

F. At the time, a technician belonging to the Defendant diagnosed the reasons why the operation of the instant accelerator was discontinued as a failure of the PC panel, and the said technician replaced the instant PCB plate by the said technician, thereby working normally again by the instant celller.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries in Gap's Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 9 through 11, Eul's Evidence Nos. 4, 7 and 14 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion.