logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.21 2016고단4781
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around August 11, 2016, the Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties and injury to the Defendant: (a) around 23:20 on August 11, 2016, the Defendant opened an apartment house 303 in front of the Sinsan-ro 220, with a human park located in the Sinsan-ro 220; (b) the residents of the above apartment and the security guards opened the tea with a large cunst sports car in the music. (c) the Defendant did not comply with the request of the Defendant to reduce music or reduce music noise; and (d) the victim, who is the circumstance in which the police box of the Seodong-dong Police Station, which belongs to the 112 police station that received the report from the above resident, called “the victim (e.g., the victim (e., the 52 years of age), who is the head of the vehicle, would not refuse to do so from the vehicle; and (e) the victim’s second installment.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by E, a police officer, and at the same time two-day medical cares for victims E.

2. On August 12, 2016, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties as stipulated in paragraph (1) and was compelled to take custody of the police officer to the police officer of the Sungdong Police Station D (F) Police Station D (F) around 00:10 on August 12, 2016. As such, it was difficult for the police officer to take a defense against the police officer. Accordingly, the said police box G was carrying the Defendant, and was in the toilet with the Defendant’s left hand hand and the toilet knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif knif knif k.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest and custody of G flagrant offenders who are police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each of the police statements made to E, G, and H is described 1.

arrow