logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.14 2015가단240399
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff, the defendant A, and the defendant A

2. An apartment set forth in paragraph 1 of the list; Defendant B shall be attached hereto.

2. entry in paragraph 2 of the list.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff indicated the claim on attached Form 1. The Plaintiff leased the apartment to the Defendants, as indicated in the Agreement and the Event of Contracts. However, the Plaintiff terminated the lease contract on the ground that the Defendants breached the contractual terms and sought the delivery of the apartment.

In the case of Defendant B, the Plaintiff raised an objection to the decision of recommending reconciliation on May 3, 2016 and served again the decision of recommending reconciliation on May 27, 2016, but the decision is impossible to serve, and the decision is rendered. 2. As to Defendant A and C, Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (the judgment by service by public notice) as to Defendant B, Article 208(3)2 (i.e., the judgment of recommending reconciliation) of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow