logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2017.09.14 2017고정62
지방재정법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chairperson of the E Federation (hereinafter referred to as the “Federation”), and the defendant B is the general director of the instant Federation.

In relation to “F”, the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Office: (a) designated the instant federation as a G subsidized project operator and received KRW 21,200,000 in the indictment on the condition that the instant federation would bear KRW 3.6 million on the condition that the FF would bear KRW 3.6 million; (b) but in fact, received KRW 17.6 million on the condition that the instant federation would have received KRW 3.6 million.

Since it is an obvious error, the contents of the indictment shall be revised and recognized.

The subsidy was paid by the Board to the local government.

No local subsidy program operator shall use the relevant local subsidy for any other purpose.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to raise some of the subsidies to be paid by the Gun Office to the instant federation as the funds of the instant federation. Around October 4, 2016, the Defendants received the amount equivalent to KRW 17.6 million from the Gun Office of the Victims under the name of the Defendant to the Nonghyup Bank (H) under the name of the Defendant for the use of 18,988,03 million in the name of training expenses, etc., while keeping KRW 2,211,970 in the remaining amount after using the 18,98,000 in the name of the participants for the use of 18,98,000 won in the name of training expenses, the Defendants did not return the balance through the settlement of local subsidies on November 3, 2016, but submitted a false resolution to the public official in charge of the said Gun office, such as I, that he paid KRW 3.3.6 million in the name of service fees.

Accordingly, the Defendants embezzled the funds of the victim and used the subsidies for other purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement to J or K;

1. A report on investigation (a report to confirm the receipts for admission);

1. Details of passbook transactions attached to a report on internal investigation (the details of passbook transactions that received subsidies);

1. Official documents for returning the F budget expenditure;

1. A statement of expenditure resolution, a statement of deposit, a statement of F pre-paid expenditure settlement, a statement of F expenditure, a statement of F expenditure, a statement of F expenditure, a public notice of the selection of an event provider, and a local subsidy.

arrow