1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The relation 1) The Plaintiff is a junior college school (hereinafter referred to as “Cspecialized school”).

(2) The Defendant was entrusted with the management and operation of the “D Promotion Project” to strengthen the competitiveness of a junior college (hereinafter “instant project”) by the Minister of Education in March 2014 under the Convention. The Defendant was entrusted with the management and operation of the said project by the Minister of Education in order to strengthen the competitiveness of the junior college in accordance with the Convention, around March 2014.

B. The Plaintiff’s project selection of the instant project and the period of the disposition suspending the execution of project costs: Five-year continuing project (23 years): - annual evaluation (two-year evaluation) and interim evaluation (2-year evaluation) for the university and college designated as insolvent universities subject to application for the determination of whether to provide continuous support; sanctions against the university and college which excludes the subject of application of the instant project from the scope of serious and clear administrative sanctions (detailed standard) - The subject: The scope of the university members deemed necessary to be directly related to the administration of the relevant university and school juristic person at the time of the occurrence of corruption and other matters related to the administrative affairs of the relevant university and the relevant school juristic person; the standards for sanctions - The standards for penalties - the Minister of Education determines to be directly related to the administration of the university (educational affairs, finance, personnel affairs, etc.) or to be necessary by the Business Management Committee: The Minister of Education, on March 27, 2014 (1) to formulate and implement separate standards for the future to prepare the implementation plan of the instant project (hereinafter referred to as “instant implementation plan”).

(2) The Plaintiff submitted each business plan on April 2, 2014 to the Defendant on April 2, 2014, and the Defendant submitted each business plan on June 25, 2014 through the first business management committee meeting on June 25, 2014.