The judgment below

All of the non-guilty parts shall be reversed.

Defendant

Of the facts charged against A, B, and C, each of the facts charged.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Prosecutor 1) Of the facts charged in the instant case against the Defendants of mistake of facts as to the acquittal portion of the lower judgment, in light of the following: (a) Violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (hereinafter “Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act”), among the facts charged against the Defendants, the Defendants were practically impossible to indicate the fact that the Defendants were not guilty; (b) theO’s disclosure of all data within the technical research institute is confidential; (c) the employees in the technical research institute shall affix their external seal; and (d) the employees in the technical research institute confirmed whether the data are included in the company’s personal data at the time of withdrawal; and (e) the Plaintiff stated that the data should be released after obtaining approval from the head of the department; and (b) the Defendants were aware of the fact that the data were not confidential; and (b) the Defendants were not required to obtain separate approval when the users change, such as the transfer, repair, etc., of computerized assets provided by the company; and (b) the Defendants were required to obtain approval from the Defendant Company No. 2’s establishment and the Defendant No. 2’s disclosure of the same trade secret.