A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On June 7, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the inn of the Suwon Friwon method. On May 16, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 6 months for the same crime, etc. in the same court on May 16, 2014. On January 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 4 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting without a license) in the same court on March 30, 2015, and the said suspended sentence became final and conclusive, and the sentence of the said suspended sentence was terminated on November 17, 2015.

[2] On May 28, 2016, the Defendant proceeded along the roads from 22:0 to 4:0 on May 28, 2016, and turned to the left at the front of the city where the Defendant is the Defendant’s residence, and driving a motor vehicle with D low alcohol level of 0.10% under the influence of alcohol level of alcohol level of the blood, from the front of the city where the Defendant is the Defendant’s residence to the front of the city where he is the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution and the police concerning E;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Statement of the circumstances of driving at home;

1. A report on internal investigation (the details of processing reports on 112);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, each summary order and judgment, and statutes on the acceptance status of each individual;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Articles 53 and 55(1)3 (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14448, Apr. 1, 201) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, and the Defendant has committed the instant crime during the period of

In determining the term of punishment, the defendant is in the time of committing his/her crime and reflects his/her depth, and the defendant appears to have used his/her proxy first on the day of the case, and others.