1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Details of public works - Project name: Urban planning facility project (road): Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City - Decision on modification of urban planning facilities (road) and approval of topographic drawings: Public announcement No. 2011-318 of October 27, 201 - Public announcement of implementation plans of urban planning facilities (road): Public announcement of inspection of implementation plans of urban planning facilities (road): March 15, 2012;

The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on June 19, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication of expropriation”): The date of expropriation: August 12, 2014 - Before 467-3, Gangdong-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 468-2, before 468-2, before 218 square meters, 758 square meters in a mountain, 76-2, and 758 square meters in a mountain, Dong mountain, 79-2, and 1,654 square meters in a mountain, 86-2, and 1,881 square meters in a mountain, Dong mountain (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”): Compensation for the instant land; The purport of the entire pleadings is as follows: 1,829, 425, 970 【No ground for recognition’; 1,2, 3, and 1 (including the Gao number);

2. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant should additionally pay compensation to the plaintiff since the plaintiff was calculated too low since the appraisal of the goods, etc. of the land to be expropriated, the comparison of the goods, etc. to be expropriated, the correction of other factors, etc., and the plaintiff's appraisal of the land to be expropriated. However, the court's appraisal of the land of this case was lower than the compensation based on the appraisal of the adjudication, in light of the fact that the adjudication of expropriation was unlawful.

There is no evidence that the compensation in the ruling of expropriation is too low.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.