All the judgment below is reversed.

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended.

The Defendants asserted that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as the grounds for appeal of this case are too unreasonable.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, the defendants were the initial offender and the defendants were divided, and some victims were recovered from damage, the punishment against the defendants by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, since the defendants' appeal is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged by the Defendants and the summary of the evidence recognized by this court are the same as the stated in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Six months of imprisonment for a suspended sentence;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Act provides that