logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.01.26 2017고단3441
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 4, 2017, at around 10:25, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as: (b) the Defendant: (c) the police box affiliated with the Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Police Station Down-gu Police Station Down-gu, Seoul, intended to control the Defendant to take out his/her nameless women; (c) the Defendant took a bath; and (d) the face of the said E one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order and prevention of crimes.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act at around 10:30 on November 4, 2017, the Defendant avoided a disturbance for about 30 minutes, including c. s. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the revocation of liquor in the official official document), and the selection of fines for the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (to the extent that the amount is aggregated) shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is being erroneous, and there is no record of criminal punishment since 2008, the punishment as set forth in the Disposition shall be determined.

arrow