1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

2. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant Han New Co., Ltd. is below.

1. Basic facts

A. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

B. 1) The expression “appraisal” is written in the body of the first instance court, and the expression “I” is written in the body of the first instance court en bloc. 2) The mark at the fourth bottom of the judgment of the first instance court is written in the following:

[Attachment 2] The total value of 171,214,714,719,914,914 30,136,136, 936, 198, 150, 85, 401 230,262,165, 9736, 267, 374, 267, 384, 267, 268, 364, 267, 364, 278, 364, 267, 364, 47, 275, 368, 47, 47, 3664, 47, 275, 364, 275, 365, 47, 267, 365, 47, 296, 276, 364, 275, 27636, 264, etc.

2. A strike on the existence and scope of defects;

A. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

B. 1) The expression “ appraiser” is deemed to be the first instance court appraiser, and the expression “I” to be the court shall be deemed to be the first instance court en bloc.