All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of each of the facts charged in the instant case’s violation of the Act on Fraud, Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving), and Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation). In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations,

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, we affirm the judgment of the court of first instance which found the Defendant guilty on the ground that each of the instant facts charged constituted a case where there is no evidence of crime, and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.