1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments to Chapter 7, Chapter 12, of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. (3) The Plaintiff, at the time of the conclusion of the instant agreement, believed that Defendant C had the authority to conclude the said agreement on behalf of the Defendant Company on behalf of the head of the instant service center at the time of the conclusion of the agreement, and there is justifiable reason to believe such agreement. As such, the Defendant Company asserts that, as the head of the instant service center, Defendant C has the duty to pay damages for free repair costs of KRW 120 million agreed upon to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 126 of the Civil Act, and KRW 30 million, which is the minimum amount until the automobile scrapping is scrapped, as well as damages for delay thereof. (B) As seen above, Defendant C is the head of the instant service center, who is a head of the instant service center, can perform the duties of general maintenance contracts on behalf of the Defendant Company, and the duties of general maintenance contracts on behalf of the Defendant Company, including A/S, and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the act of representation on behalf of the Defendant Company constitutes a legitimate representation under Article 126 of the Civil Act (see, 208).