1. The defendant shall attached Form B, C, D, E, F, G, H, K, K, M, M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, T, and U.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1 through 15 (including branch numbers where there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), each of the above statements is as follows: (a) the plaintiff (Appointed Party); (b) the appointed Party (Appointed Party); (c), D, E, F, G, H, I, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, T, U from May 2012 to July 2012; and (b) the defendant did not receive wages corresponding to the "amount in arrears" in the list of the designated parties' requests by the plaintiff (Appointed Party) from 20 days after the lapse of 10 days to 20 days; and (c) the plaintiff (Appointed Party) retired from the defendant company on July 13, 2012 after the lapse of 20 days to 20 days after the date of the appointment of the plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed Party (hereinafter the above plaintiff (Appointed Party).

[Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and Appointed E asserted that they retired from office on July 5, 2012, and filed a claim from July 21, 2012. However, according to the evidence No. 3-5, Plaintiff (Appointed Party)’s work until July 24, 2012, and Defendant E had worked until July 13, 2012, this part of the claim is rejected. Meanwhile, Plaintiff (Appointed Party) asserted that Plaintiff (Appointed Party) provided labor under employment between the Appointed and from May 2012 to July 2012, and did not receive wages of KRW 2,215,350.