Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 23:40 on January 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as the instant F’s f’s bridge f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;
1. The application of the law to the statement statement made by the police officer in F;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;
1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant had been punished by a fine of three million won for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the Daegu District Court on September 11, 2012, the Defendant committed the instant crime. However, even though the Defendant committed the instant crime, it appears that the degree of the instant assault or the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is not heavy, and that the instant crime appears to have been committed contingently, and that the Defendant did not have any past record of being sentenced to heavier punishment than the fine, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered in light of the sentencing conditions favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the instant crime.