A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the Seoul Southern District Court for four months as a crime of insult, and on May 13, 2016, the Seoul Southern District Court completed the enforcement of the sentence.

1. On June 18, 2016, around 21:42, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, was at a dispute between the Defendant’s wife C and D, before the residents’ self-governing center located in Guro-gu, Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, about three-lanes, and was dispatched after receiving the above D’s report 112, and the Defendant’s failure to comply with the Defendant’s statement in Seoul, Guro-gu, Police Station E District F to listen to the Defendant’s statement.

As we find “”, we assaulted F’s arms, and pushed the chest, thereby obstructing police officers’ legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. The Defendant is equal to the bit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a police officer.

C. Hexa flab flax only shall be installed.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the so-called “Woo Mah, Mah, Mah,” as the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Investigation report (verification, etc. of the shots), investigation report ( listening, etc. to the statements of the shots), investigation report (former G telephone statement);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a written reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, text of judgment (inwards No. 118 of investigation records), personal identification/ confinement status Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. For the reasons 0 favorable to sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: Along with the H having intellectual disability and his children, it appears that the Defendant was living together with the H having the intellectual disability and reporting about them. The instant crime also committed a contingent crime under the influence of alcohol during the process of dispute between H and D, the degree of interference with official duties is not much serious;

0.0.