All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 A 1) 사실오인(원심판결의 범죄사실 제3항에 관하여) 피고인은 2010. 12. 27. K회관 신축공사장 주변에서 다른 2명으로부터 부축받아 가고 있던 피해자 V의 엉덩이를 1회 찼을 뿐 팔꿈치로 위 피해자의 어깨부위를 내리쳐 상해를 가한 사실이 없음에도, 원심은 이 부분 공소사실을 유죄로 인정하였으니, 원심판결에는 사실을 오인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 있다. 2) 양형부당 피고인은 H아파트의 관리소장으로서 입주민들의 집회에 협조하지 않을 수 없는 처지였던 점 등에 비추어 보면, 원심이 선고한 형(벌금 100만 원)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

B. Defendant B (as to the facts of crime Nos. 3, 4, and 8), the Defendant was guilty on December 27, 2010, and ① did not inflict an injury upon the victim’s face in drinking at several times, ② did not commit an assault by breacing the victim’s Z with her face, she did not commit an act of violence by breacing the victim’s Y with her candles, and ③ did not commit an assault by taking the victim’s face face into drinking and launching. However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of all of the facts charged. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

C. As to the Defendant C (crimes Nos. 2, 6, 7-A(1) and 7-B, the Defendant parked his/her benz car on the access road entered into the new construction site of the K Center on December 20, 2010. However, the Defendant did not interfere with the work of constructing a new building of the victimO because he/she did not interfere with the work of building construction at the new construction site of the K Center on January 10, 201, and that he/she did not assault the victim AB and the victim AC on January 11, 2011.