The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal was that the Defendant did not know at all times the victim, and that there was no situation in which the left-hand arms and legs could be when the victim could be taken.

The victim and witness have made a false statement in the investigation agency and court because they were originally known to the victim.

2. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, it is recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury upon the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit. A.

The victim consistently stated the facts of damage from the investigation stage to the court of the court below.

The defendant was the victim first, and the 20th female victim's behavior without any reason is very rare, and it is confirmed that according to CCTV images immediately after the case, the victim is maintaining a boundary and distance between the defendant.

B. The statement of C, the witness of the instant case, also conforms to the victim’s statement.

There is no circumstance to see C and the victim as the death.

C It is judged that there is no motive to make a false statement(72 pages of evidence record) such as not requiring the punishment of the victim without any particular condition.

C. At the investigation stage, the Defendant stated that “C only sealed her head with a secret hand and did not have any fact at C” (Evidence Nos. 33 and 34 of the Evidence Records). The Defendant asserted that “C only was sealed with the first title C.”

However, according to CCTV images immediately after the case, it is clearly confirmed that the aspect of the defendant's taking-off of C is clear.

The Defendant appears to have confirmed the above video in the process of examining the evidence by the lower court, and subsequently reversed the statement to the effect that “a man is less than a man’s satisfic book.”

According to the above CCTV images, it cannot be seen that the defendant's left-hand leg was involved.

3...