beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On September 15, 2015, the Plaintiffs entered into a contract with the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Non-Party Company”) under which a premium is set at KRW 190,000,000 (230,000,000,000,000,000 won (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) and resells the sales right to the first floor F of neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant shopping district”) in the E apartment complex in the Silung-si City, and paid the balance to the Non-Party Company on October 1, 2015.
B. As the special terms and conditions of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiffs and the non-party company completed the lease contract (a security deposit of KRW 40 million, KRW 2.5 million, KRW 2.5 million, and KRW 31, 201, October 31, 2016, which is the scheduled date of occupancy) with Schlage, and the buyer agreed to succeed to the lease contract, and the lessee permitted the change of the name under the same conditions, thereby making a new contract.
C. On September 1, 2015, the lease agreement on the instant commercial building presented by the non-party company to the Plaintiffs was written by the lessee as “non-G et al.” and the deposit KRW 40 million (the contract amounting to KRW 4 million, the intermediate payment of KRW 4 million, the payment of KRW 32 million on March 31, 2016, and the payment of KRW 32 million on October 31, 2016), and the monthly rent of KRW 2.5 million. However, on October 13, 2015, the Plaintiffs drafted a new contract with the Defendant and the lessee as “non-Defendant et al.” in the same manner as the said lease agreement was concluded.
On December 31, 2017, the Defendant issued a confirmation letter to the effect that “G et al. and one other are joint contracts with the Defendant, and the reason for the alteration of rights is that GC and one other can not enter into a business operator registration and card merchant agreement at the time of open, and that GC gave up the contract in front of the occupancy, because GC could not enter into a business operator registration and card merchant agreement at the time of open, and that it waived the contract in front of the date of the occupancy.”
E. The Plaintiffs on March 2017.