logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.01 2018나66111
운송료
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

O's purport.

Reasons

1. On March 17, 2017, the Plaintiff, a cargo pilot, entered into a transportation service contract with Nonparty C Co., Ltd. (Representative D), a transportation company, and completed transportation of cargo from March 27, 2017 to June 30, 2017, but did not receive a total of KRW 13,506,548 from May 2017 and June 2017. ② The C representative D notified the Defendant that the Defendant would pay transportation charges to freight engineers including the Plaintiff on July 17, 2017, on the premise that the Defendant would not actually receive transportation charges from Nonparty C Co., Ltd. 1, a transportation service contract with Nonparty C Co., Ltd. (Representative D). However, the Defendant did not receive transportation charges from Nonparty C Co., Ltd., a transportation service contract with the Defendant on the premise that it would have been issued to Nonparty C Co. 2, a transportation service company’s head office (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd.’s business suspension order”).

arrow