1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The details of the disposition are the Plaintiff’s nationality.

(C-3) On October 25, 2016, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the short-term sojourn status visit (C-3) refugee status application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) as of November 1, 2016, the decision of January 4, 2018 as of the date of application for refugee status non-recognition: The fact that there is no dispute as to the grounds for rejection of the decision of September 3, 2018 as of January 18, 2018 as of the date of application for objection that no sufficient ground for recognition of refugee status could be recognized: the fact that there is no ground for rejection of the decision of the decision of September 3, 2018, as of January 18, 2018, the entry in Gap evidence

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is well-known.

The Republic of Korea is a national of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “Korea”).

The plaintiff was the first person of Bocheon-ju, and he was married around November 2010 and changed to Islamic school according to her husband.

Accordingly, the plaintiff's friendship consciousnesss threatened the plaintiff that he would die without being re-exploited to Bocheon-ro.

게다가 원고의 남편이 2015년경 사망하자 시댁 식구들은 원고를 집에서 내쫓았고, 원고는 친구의 집에서 머물다가 우간다를 떠나 대한민국으로 왔다.

As such, the Plaintiff is well-known.

Even if they return to Korea, they should be recognized as refugee because they have no place of residence, and there is a concern about threatening from friendship and friendship.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who, due to such fear, cannot return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.” 2) The foregoing evidence and evidence set forth in subparagraphs 3 and 9 of Article 2 of the Refugee Act, together with the purport of the entire arguments, are revealed.