The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. With regard to a special intimidation as to the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In light of the following facts and circumstances revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below: (a) threatened the victim by using a dangerous motor vehicle, which is a dangerous object, by stopping the motor vehicle driven by the defendant once and cutting the motor vehicle behind the defendant's vehicle.

It is reasonable to view it.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

1) On November 19, 2015, around 02:00 on November 19, 2015, the victim: (a) concealed the car-generating vehicle operated by H, who is the head of the G Report Office, from the front of the Japanese Government, to the intersection, peace roads, and roads adjacent to the Gu Treasury, over about 5km.

H Aknife a car in front of the white light, but the victim was at the time stopped, but the victim was at the time stopped again. At the time, the Defendant found the Defendant’s contact and concealed the above knife vehicle driven by H.

2) After passing a victim’s vehicle, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s driving by blocking the victim’s vehicle from driving a vehicle in front of the victim’s defective vehicle intending to drive a H from driving a vehicle in the direction of the first and second lanes in front of the victim’s defect. If the victim intends to drive a vehicle in the first and second lanes, and if the victim intends to move a two-lane, he would prevent the victim from driving a vehicle in the second way.

3) Examining the black stuff image, the Defendant at the time can verify the fact that the vehicle was driven in a manner that violates the vehicle stop signal several times, and that the vehicle was driven in an unreasonable manner, and it is difficult to deem that the vehicle was driven in the normal course of operation.

4) The victim is above the defendant at the court below's trial.