logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2020.01.16 2019고단1500
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 1, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Port Branch of Daegu District Court on February 1, 201, and received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Daegu District Court’s Port Branch on May 3, 201. On December 15, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Daegu District Court’s Port Branch on December 15, 2011.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 03:40 on September 28, 2019, the Defendant driven a fluent car with approximately 50 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.118% while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.118% from the 50m section, from the ccafeteria near the cafeteria located in the north-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, to the E-cafeteria in the south-gu, Po

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind of suspect);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, the degree of blood alcohol concentration, and the fact that there exists a record of being punished by a fine of three times due to a drunk driving);

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (in addition to the grounds for discretionary mitigation, taking into account the fact that a fine due to a drunk driving was imposed and that there is no other criminal records;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow