logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2014.07.01 2014고합3
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On December 11, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of one million won as a charge of attempted larceny in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and on February 17, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and two years under the suspension of execution for a crime of larceny, etc. on the same court. On May 12, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of six million won for a crime of attempted larceny, etc. from the Gwangju District Court’s Branch Branch on the same court on the same date on December 7, 2010, and sentenced one year and six months to imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act (Larceny) at the same court on the same date on March 20, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Sungsung Vocational Training Prison on January 26, 2014.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes” around 14:10 on March 24, 2014, at around 14:10, the Defendant confirmed that there was no way in the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D, Gangnam-gun, and carried out cash 100,000 won in the market price of the victim’s possession, which is approximately KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000 won in the market price of the victim’s possession, after having confirmed that there was no way in the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D, who was in Gangnam-gun-gun-gun, and by taking advantage of this creh, stolen and eating the property in the restaurant, and opened a window without locking, and intruded with it.

As a result, the Defendant habitually stolen the property of approximately KRW 2,009,870 owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, personal records, current status of personal identification and confinement, and copies of each judgment;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Article 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Selection of Punishment.

arrow