Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who was working as the head of the same apartment management office from January 1, 2010 to August 30, 2010, and Defendant C is a person who served as the head of the same apartment management office from January 18, 2013 to December 18, 2013.

On the other hand, the victim F. From May 24, 201 to December 31, 2011, the victim was the president of the same apartment council, from August 16, 2013 to December 31, 201, and from August 16, 201 to December 31, 201, the same council of occupants’ representatives was the auditor of the apartment.

The Defendants had the aim to impair the honor of the victims who had conflicting relations with them with respect to the old-age replacement work of apartment houses and roof waterproof work.

1. On June 8, 2015, the Defendants conspired and held that at the above E Apartment Management Office, Defendant A and Defendant B used the FJ’s audit status for the purpose of using the FJ’s audit status, and that they met and illegally recorded several companies by taking advantage of the FJ’s audit status.

Defendant C, the head of the management office, prepared the printed matter stating “, and had the Defendant C, the head of the management office, distribute the printed matter at the public hearing at which the chairperson G of the same apartment council, the representative H of the same Dong, and 11 other were present, thereby publicly pointing out false facts. 2. On June 23, 2015, the Defendants conspired and conspired with Defendant A and Defendant B, “312 Dong, 314 Dong, 321 Dong, and 321 Dong residents’ thickness.”

Using the F position of the auditor in the reply of the title "", the order of the old-age replacement work is uncertain and the order of the old-age replacement work is made only by several public corporations from the base of 2013.