The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that on September 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:20 on the platform of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B B B B 2, the victim C (the victim 35 years of age, son) who was an employee of the street control service, illegally sells over-the-day with a service room to identify the imposition of a fine for negligence and personal information; (b) the victim’s defective money “I need to do so because it is necessary to do so; and (c) the victim’s “I am? I am? I am? I am? I am?? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am?

D. The victim openly insultingd, such as mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa

2. Determination

A. In the crime of defamation or insult, “public performance” refers to a state in which many, unspecified or unspecified persons can be recognized. Thus, if there is a possibility that certain facts about a specific person may be disseminated to an unspecified or unspecified person, even if they talk about a certain fact, it shall be deemed that the public performance is lacking if it satisfies the requirements of performance, or if it is not likely to spread otherwise.

(Supreme Court Decision 81Do1023 delivered on October 27, 1981, etc.). B.

According to each evidence of the submission by the prosecutor, it is recognized that the defendant expressed C the desire as stated in the facts charged.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, namely, C argues that only one female passenger was in the vicinity at the time that the Defendant took a bath, but C did not specifically state his/her personal information, location, time, etc., and not specifically state his/her personal information, location, etc., in the video taken by C, as well as the passengers visiting the platform at the time of the video taken by C, is not discovered, and considering the location, voice, train noise, etc. of the Defendant.