logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2019.09.04 2019고정95
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates C in South-gu, South-gu, South-do.

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall not place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from October 1, 2018 to December 27, 2018, the Defendant purchased KRW 65 km 5 km 548,000 from Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, in total, in the total of 13 times from October 1, 2018 to December 27, 2018, and indicated the country of origin of KRW 63 km as a food spacker, and provided cooking, selling and providing it as a domestic product.

As a result, the Defendant falsely indicated the origin of German swine Co., Ltd. as a domestic product.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to photograph evidence of violation of the origin of swine, investigation report (verification of the details of purchase of shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot s

1. Article 14 (1) and Article 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is a person running C in South-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gyeong-si.

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall not place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from August 17, 2018 to September 27, 2018, the Defendant purchased at KRW 50 km 50 km of Germany, a total of nine times from August 17, 2018 to September 27, 2018, and indicated the country of origin as a food name tag as a domestic product, and provided cooking, selling, and providing it as a food name tag. In addition, from August 14, 2018 to September 22, 2018, the Defendant overlaps with Germany over a total of eight times.

arrow