1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) G is a corporation established around December 21, 2002 by the I, which mainly focuses on the manufacture and sale of analysis devices, solar power generation industry, etc. (Evidence 1) and the Plaintiff was working as the head of G’s management support office. (2) Defendant D is a corporation operating new and renewable energy-related technology development and solution supply business. Defendant B is its representative director. Defendant E is a corporation operating venture business investment and investment advisory business, and Defendant C (H prior to its name) is its representative director.

B. G’s project implementation and B, Plaintiff 1), the former representative director of G, while establishing G and carrying out the analysis device development project, the former representative director of G, from around 2004, would promote solar power generation business as its main power business, and the development project for solar power generation facilities by employing researchers, such as J, etc. (hereinafter “instant project”).

A) Through this, I applied for a patent for K L and applied for a patent for MN. 2) Since 2005, G had experienced financial difficulties due to personnel expenses and development costs, etc. for the instant project, G had the Investment Agency of G colored. Accordingly, around August 24, 2005, G entered Defendant B as a vice president in charge of attracting investment in the instant project and raising funds, and around August 24, 2005, the Plaintiff, which was the next high school of I, was included in the management support office.

C. On August 22, 2005, G entered into the Stockholm option contract between G and the Plaintiff, between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, concluded the Stockholm option contract with the following content (hereinafter “Stockholm option contract”).

The Stockholm option Agreement G (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “B”) enter into a contract relating to the grant of stock options (hereinafter referred to as “Stockholm options”) as follows:

Article 1 [Number of Stocks Issued to Stockholm] The total number of shares shall be 6,698 shares.

The total number of shares issued before and after issuance.