1. Of the judgment of the first instance against the plaintiff, the part against the plaintiff ordering additional payment shall be revoked.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: C national highway construction project (hereinafter referred to as "project of this case"): Public announcement: June 17, 201; D- Project operator announced by the Busan Regional Construction Administration on June 17, 201; Defendant (the head of the Busan Regional Construction and Management Administration)

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on May 25, 2012 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”): 14 lots of land listed in the “List of Land” listed in attached Table 1, owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant land”) and 320 pieces of ground obstacles (hereinafter “in this case’s obstacles, etc.”) from 18 lots of land, other than 18 lots of land owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant obstacles, etc.”) - Compensation for expropriation: KRW 683,443,100 of the instant land, and KRW 1,592,074,190 of the instant obstacles, etc., and KRW 1,592,074,190 of the instant obstacles, etc. (including KRW 349,90,000 of the instant obstacles, etc.) - Appraisal Corporation: Korea Appraisal Corporation, Inc. (hereinafter “Appraisal Appraisal Corporation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on August 22, 2013 (hereinafter “Objection”) - Contents of the ruling: The Plaintiff’s assertion on an increase in compensation - The increase in compensation as follows: 702,371,700 won in the instant land; and 1,669,839,380 won in the instant obstacles, etc. (including livestock compensation 381,447,000 won): A new appraisal corporation, a stock company, a stock appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal”)

D. The appraisal of the first instance court’s entrustment to F of the appraisal (hereinafter “the appraisal of the first instance court”) is based on the following: (a) the appraisal of “compensation for business suspension due to the transfer of the fish shed” included in the compensation for expropriation of obstacles, etc. in the instant case; (b) the calculation of operating income based on the business performance for the last three years due to the expansion of the business facilities following the acquisition of “Z” on July 2010 constitutes a case where it is considerably improper.