1. The Defendant’s KRW 97,500,000 as well as 5% per annum from February 6, 2013 to November 13, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to A high-priced vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to B MT vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On December 1, 2012, around 05:30 on December 1, 2012, the occurrence of the insured events, the direction of the wind road between 05:30, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, for the Plaintiff vehicle, the second line in the case of the Defendant vehicle, and the third line in the case of the Defendant vehicle, the front line in the front line of the Plaintiff vehicle and the front line in the case of the Defendant vehicle. The impact of the Plaintiff vehicle and the Defendant vehicle on the front line in the case of the Defendant vehicle. “The impact of the Plaintiff vehicle and the Defendant vehicle” is “the impact of the Plaintiff vehicle.

(C) The Plaintiff paid KRW 195 million to the bereaved family members of the 3rd driver’s vehicle due to the accident at issue on February 5, 2013. D. In full view of the trace of the accident at the accident scene, E who driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle was deprived of the third driver’s right line at the time of the accident and went beyond the central separation zone at the left-hand side, and died. D. The Plaintiff was not guilty of the accident at issue on the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (which was charged for the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents). However, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having caused the accident at issue on the ground that the Plaintiff’s vehicle was not guilty of the accident at issue on the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (which was charged for the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents).