Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 24, 2017, the Defendant, who was a substitute driver at around 21:50 on August 24, 2017, requested the victim B to go through another place before the destination.

The victim reported that the victim should report it to the company as a message, and started to take the victim's desire in the vehicle, and the victim did not drive his/her vehicle.

1. The Defendant, at the time of the above day, was in the front of the 51-ro 219-No. 219-gil, the head of Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and the Defendant reported several times, such as apartment residents, persons, and police officers called out.

Fus fluort fluort, fluort and fluora.

C cpbol

E. The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the large sound called “Isar Isar”.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim at the above date, time, and at the above place, with a shoulder part of the victim’s chest part once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of fines) concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment (the point of violence and the selection of fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the victim of the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order wishes to punish the defendant, the defendant is committed in the course of committing the crime, and the degree of violence is not serious, the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc. as stated in the arguments of this case shall be determined by taking into account all the factors of sentencing as stated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, and environment.