1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. G (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on September 26, 1997, and the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, who are the wife of the deceased, succeeded to the deceased.

B. On September 10, 1997 and the 15th of the same month, the Deceased donated the real estate indicated below (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) to the Defendant, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant.

Afterwards, the real estate listed in the sequence 7 through 12 in each of the above real estate was disposed of or expropriated in others as listed in the following table:

[ table] The deceased's disposal price (won) as to whether to dispose of the real estate's No. 1,124 square meters donated to the defendant; 1,124 square meters owned by the deceased; 2.0,000 m2; 3.0,000 m2; 1,000 m2; 4,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2; 3,000 m2,000,000 m2,000 m2,000,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,00 m25,00 m2,013,00 m2,05 m2,013.

C. In addition to each of the instant real estate, the Deceased owned 1,150 square meters prior to Kimhae-si (hereinafter “instant divided real estate”). On August 12, 1999, the Plaintiffs, the Defendant, and the H shared the agreement on inherited property by allocating the shares of 5/10 of the instant land to the Plaintiffs and the Defendant on August 12, 1999, who were ex post facto of the Deceased, and the shares of 1/10 of the said land to the Plaintiffs and the Defendant.

The instant real estate subject to consultation was disposed of on July 30, 2014, and KRW 578,119,536 out of the price was distributed to Plaintiff W, respectively, to the rest of the Plaintiffs and the Defendant.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 5, and Eul 7.