logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.02.05 2020나1334
건물명도
Text

1. The appeal filed by the respondent (quasi-Review Plaintiff) is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the respondent (a quasi-Appellant).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From January 1, 202, the applicant entered into a lease agreement with the respondent (quasi-Review Plaintiff; hereinafter “the respondent”) [Attachment 1] / [Attachment 2] among the first basements below the real estate listed in the real estate list [Attachment 1] among the first basements below the real estate listed in the real estate list [Attachment 2] drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, and 16.53 square meters above the “A” portion between the applicant and the respondent on November 29, 2018, and entered into the lease agreement in which the lease agreement was renewed (hereinafter “the lease agreement”). The lease agreement was concluded between the respondent and the respondent on November 29, 2018, with the amount of KRW 49,810,000, monthly rent of KRW 665,600 (Additional value assessment separately), monthly management maintenance cost of KRW 81,100 (Additional value assessment separately), and the lease agreement between January 1, 2019 to December 31, 31.

2) The instant lease agreement stipulates as follows.

The applicant and the respondent shall be detrimental to the filing telephone for the implementation of the instant lease agreement.

Expenses incurred in the procedures for the authentication of relevant delegations and the filing of lawsuits shall be borne by the applicant and the respondent, and the respondent shall keep the power of representation for the filing of the lawsuit and the filing of the contract of this case.

The applicant (Article 30(3)3 of the Lease Agreement of this case) shall, immediately before entering into the lease agreement of this case, delegate the legal representation to the attorney-at-law on the case of filing a petition under the lease agreement between the applicant and the respondent, and grant the authority of judicial and non-judicial reconciliation, etc. to the respondent.

The applicant issued a letter of delegation of the lawsuit in the same letter as “,” and the applicant completed the power of attorney with a seal affixed to the column for delegation of the above form of delegation of the lawsuit. On November 29, 2018, the notary public D signed the instant lease agreement with the applicant upon obtaining certification that the signature and seal of the power of attorney was confirmed to be the respondent at the office of notary public D, and submitted the certificate to the applicant (hereinafter “certificate of this case”) to keep the applicant.

(b).

arrow