A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2017, at around 21:45, the Defendant driven a B-learning car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.086% from around 400 meters to around 2425, the day before the welfare park, 514-2, G-ririri, G-riririri, G-ri, N-ri, N-ri, N-ri, G-ri, N-ri, N-ri, N-ri, N-ri, N-ri, N-ri,

Summary of Evidence

The defendant's legal statement alcohol driving control results, the driver's statement report, the driver's license ledger, the vehicle vehicle inquiry, the details of management of the main report, the inquiry of the facts of the crime subject to the law as a result of the crackdown on the driving of alcohol, and the facts of the crime subject to the application of the law as a result of the check of the control of the driving of alcohol, and the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of Article 62-2 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Sentence 3 and Article 44 (1) of the same Act, including the degree of driving at the time, the degree of driving distance, and the age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the sentence as ordered.

The circumstances that are disadvantageous: The defendant recognized a crime and reflects the fact that he/she has been sentenced three times to a fine due to drinking, etc., but it leads to the driving of drinking, which is not good to the quality of the crime.