Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a person engaged in self-business, and the victim B (24) is aware of himself/herself as an employee in the drinking house. On November 30, 2015, around 00:30, at the entrance and exit door of “D” located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant used assaulting the victim at one time as he/she was under the influence of alcohol because he/she did not have any identification card, thereby controlling the victim’s access to the drinking house.
2. Determination and conclusion
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act;
B. On January 5, 2016, after the prosecution of this case, submission of a written agreement to the effect that the injured person does not wish to punish the defendant.
(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;