logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.28 2018나101329
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is partly dismissed as set forth in the following paragraph (2), and the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding paragraphs (1) and attached Form 1, limited to co-defendants) are as follows, and therefore all corresponding parts are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for adding the judgment of paragraph (3) below. The height part of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to the apartment of paragraph (3) in the table of attached Forms 5 and 6, which is set forth in the list of Attached Forms 1 and 5.

Around October 21, 2014, the first instance judgment No. 4 to 7, 2014, the Defendant C notified the Defendant C of the purport that “A shipment of explanatory materials by October 31, 2014, as the time period for entering into a renewal contract expires on October 30, 2014,” “Around October 21, 2014, it is impossible to renew the contract in excess of the standard amount for maintaining occupancy eligibility (24,940,000 won) for the Defendant’s assets (automobile). In this case, the Defendant sent a notice of explanatory materials (No. 7) to the effect that “A.,” but the Defendant purchased the used cars by registered mail.”

In the fourth sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the part on the basis of the recognition of the 5 and 6th sentence shall add “A evidence 7-1, 2, and 3” to the 5 and 6th sentence.

제1심판결문 제5면 제3행의 “임대차게약 걍신”을 “임대차계약 갱신”으로 고친다.

According to Article 6 (1) of the Housing Lease Protection Act, the lessor notifies the lessee of the refusal of renewal during the period from six months to one month before the expiration of the lease term.

arrow