logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.26 2017가합511230
손해배상 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant: 198,591,733 won to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff; and 5% per annum from March 3, 2017 to April 26, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) the Party’s status 1) E.S. Global (hereinafter “E.S.”);

) The Plaintiff is a corporation that provided lectures to prepare for a public official’s test while operating a private teaching institute and Internet website (htp:/www.mega.com) of a trade name “MecST,” and the Plaintiff was merged on October 4, 2016 with Es global (hereinafter “Plaintiff, regardless of whether before or after the merger”).

(2) The Defendant concluded a lecture with the Plaintiff and agreed to teach B subjects on the Plaintiff’s educational institute and Internet website.

3) On December 22, 2017, the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor, while continuing the instant lawsuit, transferred all assets and business related to the instant lawsuit, including the right to the instant lawsuit from the Plaintiff, including police officers, etc., and succeeded to the instant lawsuit. B. On July 1, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a compulsory contract with the Defendant with the following content (hereinafter “instant compulsory contract”).

Article 4 (Period of Contract) (1) The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2020, and shall be automatically extended 12 months, if there is no separate declaration of intention in writing by 60 days before the expiration date of the contract.

(4) The terms of this Agreement shall enter into force upon conclusion.

Article 6 (Defendant’s Right and Duty) (1) The Defendant provided lectures only on the Plaintiff’s website and private teaching institutes (including private teaching institutes designated and recommended by the Plaintiff) during the contract period. The Defendant may not offer lectures contrary to the purpose of this Agreement through digital storage media (hereinafter “similar media, etc.”) other than the media directly operated by the Plaintiff or the media designated or approved by the Plaintiff, such as offline private teaching institutes, public wave education institutes, wire and satellite broadcasting, CD/DD broadcasting, etc. (hereinafter “similar media”).

Article 13 (1) The defendant shall be within the scope of the business stipulated in Article 2 of this Agreement during the contract term.

arrow