logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.08.18 2016고단690
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 25, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and on April 20, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on June 11, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the same court.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a B rocketing car that did not purchase mandatory insurance.

On February 6, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license of a motor vehicle on February 19:46, 2016, driven the said rocketing motor vehicle with a alcohol content of 0.163% at the same time while under the influence of alcohol, and led the front of the said 101 parking lot to the 102 east from the parking lot.

Since there are many parked vehicles and roads in front of an apartment parking lot with a narrow width, in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by reducing the speed of the driver, properly operating the front and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went into operation, and took the front part of the D QM3 passenger car owned by the victim C, which is the part of the victim C, and the front part of the FSP car owned by the victim E, and subsequently, the part of the victim G-owned by the victim G-owned by the victim G, who was parked in the said part before the right side of the other car. The Defendant continued to take part of the back part of the victim G-owned by the victim G-owned by the victim G, who was parked in the said part before the left side of the said apartment house.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the above job, which caused the above QM3 car repair cost to be KRW 420,876, and the above SP car.

arrow