logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단5966
독점규제및공정거래에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million.

Defendant

B above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Status of Defendant B, etc.] From around 2000 to the date, Defendant B is the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”) and Defendant A, a corporate entity established for the purpose of the CCTV manufacturing business and monitoring camera installation business, and F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) is a corporate entity established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling illegal spirits control systems, or a business entity established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling illegal spirits control systems, and I Co., Ltd. (the representative director J, Ansan-si, Dayang-si, K, 705, hereinafter “I”); the representative director of the corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing transportation facilities and developing related software, and the representative director of the corporation established for the purpose of developing the digital telecommunications network and software, and the representative director of the corporation established for the purpose of 0 U.S. 1, 200, 200, 200 U.S., 10, 200, 200, 200

[Detailed Criminal Facts]

1. The executive director B, the representative of the Defendant A Defendant Company, and the executive director Y, the use of which, was the Defendant A’s executive director, had been expressed at the Seoul Regional Public Procurement Service’s tender at an estimated price of KRW 751,042,91 on August 18, 201, in relation to the “construction of CCTV in the protection zone for children and the low-price competition” bidding of “construction of CCTV in the protection zone for children and the low-price competition, and had an intention to make a bid by agreement with R and bid price by abusing the fact that the low-price bid was prevented, and the contract was concluded when concluding

Therefore, the defendant is the representative of the defendant B.

arrow