1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff lent 200 million won to the defendant around June 2005 as the cause of the claim in this case. However, Gap 1 who seems to support the fact of the claim cannot use it as evidence due to lack of evidence to prove the authenticity, and some of Gap 4's statements and witness Eul's testimony are difficult to readily believe them in light of witness D's witness's partial testimony, etc., and it is insufficient to recognize this point solely on the basis of each part of Gap 2-7's testimony, and there is no other evidence to prove this point, and therefore, the plaintiff's argument that it is difficult to accept.

2. According to the conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim for return of the instant loan cannot be accepted.