Text
1. In accordance with the claim filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) in addition to this Court, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
Reasons
1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendants for return of unjust enrichment and collection of by-products, each of the tort committed against Defendant D and F, and the claim for restitution of the land survey end to Defendant D. The Defendants filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff.
The first instance court, among the principal lawsuit, partly accepted the claim for damages caused by the tort against Defendant D, the claim for the survey costs against Defendant D and F, and dismissed all of the remaining claims, and dismissed the counterclaim.
In light of the petition of appeal, the statement of grounds of appeal, and the written changes in the grounds of appeal submitted by the Plaintiff, only the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the Defendants, only a claim for return of unjust enrichment against the Defendants, and a claim for damages against Defendant D based on unlawful acts. The Plaintiff extended the purport of the claim for return of unjust enrichment against the Defendants to this court, the Plaintiff withdraws the claim for damages due to the Defendant F’s unlawful acts, and reduced the claim for damages due to Defendant D’s unlawful acts, and the claim for the measurement costs against Defendant C and E were reduced, and added the claim for the measurement costs against Defendant C and E., the subject of this court’s judgment is limited to the claim for return of unjust enrichment against the Defendants, the claim for damages due to Defendant C and E’s unlawful acts, and the claim for
2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance (hereinafter “basic facts”) except for the following parts.
3. Judgment on the main claim
A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion B and the Defendants’ assertion 1) are as follows: (a) the portion of the Plaintiff’s assertion on unjust enrichment against the Defendants are as follows: (b) the portion of the land located within the scope of 592 square meters in the ship connected each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, and 1 on the ground of the H land of this case in sequence; and
B. B.O. H. Part