1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The facts below the basis facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5 (including where there are serial numbers).

On December 22, 1966, the Plaintiff’s father completed the registration of change of ownership on the ground of “sale on January 5, 1960,” and on June 16, 1971, E (the father of the Plaintiff) purchased the instant real estate from “F, G, H, A (Plaintiff), I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, or on December 9, 1993: on the instant real estate, on the basis of the area conversion, on December 2, 1993, the registration of change was made in 66 square meters, and the Defendant completed the criminal registration of change of ownership on October 20, 198 under the name of the owner of the instant real estate under the Act on Special Measures for the Acquisition of Ownership (hereinafter “Special Measures for the Acquisition of Ownership”) and entered the same as “the owner of the instant real estate under the name of the Guarantee 198, Mar. 19, 198.”

C. On September 29, 1998, the instant real estate was merged and transferred to Sacheon City C, and its registry was closed.

2. The parties' assertion

A. After the Plaintiff’s father’s father’s death, the Plaintiff did not register inheritance of the instant real estate after the Plaintiff’s father’s death, but was actually owned by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff, around 1990, managed the instant real estate as a vacantter, demanded that the Defendant’s living net T was temporarily used, and consented that he would temporarily use the instant real estate as a match.

However, the network.