logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.23 2014고정1939
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who was an operator of the Association President, and Defendant B was a financial director of the Association.

1. On January 16, 2013, Defendant A posted the video images of the title “H” with the name of posted “G” on the video site’s note (F) at an influence place.

On November 4, 2012, the above video was edited with the caption "I of the bathing specialist on November 4, 2012" that the victim I participated in the debate of the E Association organized by the J building located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that I tried to see the Doctrine by interested in the Doctrine and bring the Doctrine.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public facts through information and communication network with a view to slandering the victim.

2. Around January 16, 2013, Defendant B published a letter as “O” in the Internet E-Association website (M) at the Goyang-si, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si with the title “O” as an author, at the Internet E-Association website (M).

The contents of this article are as follows: The President of the Korean War Association, the President of the Korean National Assembly, and R and the current voice in Q, one of the cines, the desire of the President of the Korean National Assembly, the President of the Korean National Assembly, and the President of the Korean National Assembly, the President

More violent field materials were referred to as "in this place," and the video images as described in paragraph 1 were inserted together with this article.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public facts through information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. A criminal investigation report (related to certification of cell phones on the mer-day), a criminal investigation report (related to specific suspects), a criminal investigation report ( analysis of details of currency), or a criminal investigation report (excluding part of 1 to 237 pages of investigation records);

1. Details of replies related to a warrant of search, seizure, and verification, all N connected records, communications including A mobile phone, and B mobile phone communications;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to video CDs (Investigation Records 312 pages);

1. Criminal facts;

arrow