The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2011, the Defendant had been living together with the victim D, who is a legal husband, in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, due to the her former female-child movement in Dongjak-gu, where he/she had a dispute, he/she could take the face of the victim a drinking time, and he/she got off the laddr with the ladr with the ladr, and led the victim to a two-day medical system that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Photographs materials and medical certificates;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigative reports (Attachment of Kakao Stockholm messages);

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part rejecting a prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the injured person does not want the punishment of the defendant, and that there is no criminal history against the defendant) of the suspended sentence

1. On August 12, 2011, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim in a way that the victim’s head was drinking, and the victim’s arms, legs, etc. was quihioned, during the process of disputeing with the victim, as a matter of intention in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a matter of intention within Dongjak-gu.

On August 17, 2011, the Defendant, at the place described in the preceding port around August 17, 2011, tried to use the victim’s scam to have a dispute over the previous female-friendly issues of the victim, and assaulted the victim.

On August 24, 2011, the Defendant came to know that the injured person had expressed his mother's family problem, etc. to the mother of the Defendant at the place indicated in the front port of the new wall, and assaulted the injured person by a method of sliding the victim's sexual organ, such as the victim's chest and the mother.

On August 24, 2011, the Defendant left the place at the port of the border, and returned home to the victim, with the wheels of the victim who saw his hand and her fingers as a hand saw on the ground that the victim did not have his own telephone while on duty, and conspired with the victim.