logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.12.15 2016고정3431
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, driving a vehicle at Bribe on Bribe on March 16, 2016, and driving a three-lane road in the direction of the same police station in the direction of the same route, depending on the two-lanes of the road in front of the first East International Newspapers in Busan Metropolitan City.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to properly see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to accurately operate and operate the system and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to operate it as it is.

A victim C(63 years old) driver C(63 years old) who was driving in front of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the D(46 years old) driving and the G-fol vehicle under the F(54 years old) driving.

The Defendant, due to such occupational negligence, damaged the driver of the damaged vehicle E-learning vehicle with e-learning base, tensions, etc. for two weeks in need of medical treatment, damaged the driver of the G-capf vehicle, damaged the diversified salt unit in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, damaged the e-learning vehicle in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, and damaged the e-learning vehicle in the damaged vehicle to KRW 17,270,000 at the same time for repairing the damaged vehicle B at the same time, with the e-learning vehicle in need of KRW 5,095,220 for repair costs, and damaged the damaged vehicle to cover KRW 2,68,820 for repair costs.

2. No owner of an automobile violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on the road unless he/she has bought mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a vehicle in B, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as that mentioned in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. D. D.

arrow