1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff supplied a total amount of KRW 27,580,000 from October 2020 to September 2014. However, the Defendant received a total of KRW 17,215,000 from the Defendant for the price of goods. As such, the Defendant is obliged to pay the remainder of KRW 10,365,00 to the Plaintiff.

B. Although the facts that agricultural chemical transactions had occurred between the Plaintiff and the Defendant during the above period, the Defendant continued to pay the price to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant finally paid KRW 3,000,000 on December 28, 2017, thereby paying the said price in full.

2. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the amount of unpaid goods worth KRW 10,365,000 against the Defendant remains, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

A No. 2 (Transaction No. 2) is merely a document prepared by the Plaintiff, and the Defendant recognized the above details of transactions.

There is no indication that he/she agreed or consented to the details of transactions, nor there is no tax invoice, certificate of acceptance, etc. which can recognize the details of transactions.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.