logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.07.24 2019고단1972
사기방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Four copies (No. 1 through 4) of the seized physical card shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around April 15, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal from the Defendant, “B,” which read, “D,” and received, from the Defendant, that “In order to collect information from illegal private territory, for the purpose of tax saving, 2% of the cash deposited from the check to the account that is directed by the Defendant to withdraw cash using the check card and to transfer cash to the account that is directed by the Defendant.” From that time, the Defendant received the check card under the name of another person in accordance with the direction of “D,” and received it from that time to that time, deposited money deposited in the account connected with the check in cash with the check, and then deposited money into the account given by the said “D,” which was instructed by the said “D.”

The Defendant received the check card in the name of another person in a secret manner, and then deposited money into an account connected with the check card immediately after the lapse of 30 minutes from the time of withdrawal (30 minutes), and the check card used for the Defendant’s business should be used and discarded only twice, and the check card should be deposited into the account in the name of another person and resident registration number several times at the time of receiving the check card. Before performing the above business, the Defendant made inquiries as to whether the Defendant’s business was scaming damage. Unlike the payment of the Defendant’s allowance at a time, the Defendant paid the check in proportion to the amount of cash withdrawal, and the amount of the Defendant’s allowance is more than that of the ordinary amount of cash withdrawal, such as immediately paying 2% of the amount of the cash withdrawal from the ordinary amount of cash withdrawal, and thus, the Defendant is not a simple cash withdrawal and a cash withdrawal.

arrow