1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

(4) In addition to the physical status of the land and the building in this case, the physical status of the land and the building in this case, such as the land category, the building site of the building in this case, the actual use and purpose thereof, whether the building is violated on the building ledger, the matters on ownership, the rights of the goods that are not actually related or publicly notified (such as lease contract, etc.), building-to-land ratio (60%) and floor area ratio (400%).

The above facts revealed that the land in this case constitutes a small channel less than 8 meters wide on the district unit planning zone solely with the statement of the land use plan confirmation certificate as follows. ② The confirmation and explanatory note of the object of brokerage as to the land in this case and buildings in this case including specific use area, specific use district, specific use zone, specific use zone, building-to-land ratio limit and floor area ratio limit, etc., with the exception of the part indicated as "*", and if Defendant D did not notify that the land in this case is planned to be incorporated into a road on the district unit planning, it appears that the above indication "*" appears to have been explained by a separate confirmation and explanatory document along with the confirmation and explanatory statement of object of brokerage, ③ there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiffs constructed the building in this case to Defendant D at the time of the conclusion of the sales contract in this case. Rather, it appears that Defendant D did not notify that it is planned to be incorporated into a road on the district unit planning plan.

(a) as described in paragraph 2;